|
Lost in CyberSpace By David N. GreenField, Ph. D.
|
||||||
|
Known by many names such as Internet Addiction, Compulsive Internet Disorder, or Pathological Internet Use, there is hardly a mental health or addictions practitioner who hasn't seen some form of this modern digital malady. Family Law attorneys report record numbers of divorces related to cyber-sex and cyber-affairs. Employees are fired for cyber-slacking at work because of excessive e-mail, downloading pornography or endless cyber-surfing. There is no doubt that the Internet is the spearhead of the digital industrial revolution, but it is also the sword of Damocles when it comes to its powerful psychological impact on people's lives. My research survey of nearly 18,000 people (in conjunction with ABCNEWS.com), showed that nearly 6 percent of those surveyed met the strict criteria for Compulsive Internet use, with another 4–6 percent abusing the 'Net on a regular basis. The Internet is not totally benign; it has powerful mood-altering capabilities, and over 29 percent of those I studied report using the Internet to alter their mood or escape. The Reality of Internet and Computer Addiction
Losing Control Fred is on the corporate fast track to money and success, contemplating becoming engaged to his girlfriend. Everything seems great except that Fred is addicted to pornography on the Internet. When I first met him, he was spending several hours during and after work viewing pornographic pictures, sometimes until 3:00 a.m., only to be at work again by 7:00 a.m. He compulsively rented adult videos and planned his business trips around having access to the 'Net or adult-video stores. Sometimes he would buy sexual products over the 'Net and has even found himself "ripped off" through his credit card. Fred spent hundreds of dollars on Internet access while surfing on the 'Net for hours, searching for naked women. He described himself as obsessed, out of control but unable to stop. He'd tried half-a-dozen times before, but with no lasting results. Fred finally came to see me, responding to our ad and Web site discussing Internet addiction issues. He no longer felt he had control of this part of his life, and he was scared. He could control every other aspect of his life, but this one was too powerful to handle. Through psychotherapy and a therapy group, he has been getting the needed help, and his life is turning around. For Fred and others, interaction with the Internet can become so sexually stimulating that it leads to an addictive pattern of use.
Is it Physical or Psychological? The psychological dependence that occurs when someone becomes habituated (tolerant) to a behavior or substance is very powerful. Almost all the people I treat for addiction feel a need for the behavior or substance that controls them. In fact, many of the people I have interviewed state that they need their Internet use in much the same way. For those, the Internet use has become out of control, taking a central, dysfunctional position. Perhaps no case better expresses the power of Internet addiction than Sandra Hacker's. She made front-page news as the first well-publicized legal case involving Internet addiction. She was charged with neglecting her children while spending all day and night online. She had apparently left her children to live in squalor while she locked herself in a nice, clean room with a new computer and modem. This case drew a lot of publicity because it broke the country's collective denial about the possibility of addiction to the Internet, and it showed how the Internet might negatively affect children. The story demonstrated that the power of Internet addiction could override even the most basic instincts of protecting children. While it does reflect an extreme example, her case is probably less unique than we think. Since then, I have been contacted numerous times to consult with individuals about Internet addiction and child custody issues, along with cases where Internet addiction has affected marriages, jobs, finances and relationships.
We Get High From What We Do
The Use and Abuse of the Internet We don't like to feel uncomfortable, and we don't have time for bad feelings, which require us to think, feel and perhaps do something that might take some effort to change our lives. This can be a hard thing for many of us to do. The reasons why this is so hard are complex. It probably involves an expectation in our culture that we shouldn't have to feel badly at all, and if we have to feel badly, it should not be for very long. Addictions may, in part, be the result of a society that has lost its ability to heal itself, a society with no tolerance for pain and no patience to change. Addictions are a way of separating us from our inner experience, which is done with the implicit approval of everyone we meet, including the media. No one wants to feel anything, least of all, anything uncomfortable. So we go on and try to numb our discomfort in a wide variety of ways, with the Internet as the latest. That is not to say that the Internet is completely bad; it certainly is not. It can make a huge contribution toward improving the quality of our lives. However, the Internet's addiction potential is simply the opposite side of the coin and represents a dialectic of the good it can do.
The Longest River: Denial In the case of the gambling addict, there may be repeated warnings that his or her spouse will not tolerate continued spending of household savings, job loss and constant harassment by creditors. In light of this, the gambling addict will still deny that he or she has a problem with gambling, believing personal actions are still in complete control of the gambler. However, denial permits one to distort reality, a very powerful psychological defense; it can have devastating consequences on our lives, and the ability to disregard such negative consequences while continuing the behavior is a hallmark of denial. Denial is present, to some extent or another, in all addictions. It's necessary, in the development of an addictive process, to experience a sense of denial while the addiction is beginning to take hold. Otherwise, we would not continue with the addictive behaviors. Because of denial, the impact of our negative behavior is never fully appreciated until the consequences become so overwhelming that they can no longer be ignored. This is sometimes referred to as "hitting bottom." People may continue their behavior indefinitely, with no recognition of the negative consequences of their actions, in spite of numerous personal disasters. Often an individual will not seek help for a specific problem, unless the person has recognized that he or she is no longer in control of the situation and needs help. This usually happens at a point when the negative impact of addiction has become grossly obvious and denial is broken. Recognition of loss of control is a process that cannot be rushed. Each person has to discover his or her own time frame for how and when to deal with addiction. This, of course, can be very frustrating for family and friends of the addict, who often notice the problem long before the addict does. Negative consequences of addictive Internet use vary considerably. I have been consulted on Internet cases in which employees have been caught using their work computers for personal Internet access (in some cases wasting considerable company time and/or downloading sexually related material onto company-owned computers). In some cases, individuals could be charged with sexual harassment as a consequence of exposing fellow employees to sexually explicit material against their will (even accidentally!). There are also numerous cases even resulting in child-custody investigations of couples with significant marital or relationship problems due to Internet abuse! Every day I hear or receive stories of people who are getting into trouble with their online behavior at home or at work. We as a society, along with the mental health and addictions professions, are in collective denial about the extent of some the real and potential problems with Internet use and abuse. Although it is not clear how widespread compulsive Internet usage is, it is clearly a growing problem. I fear that as broadband access increases from the current 6 percent level, we will see an increase in compulsive Internet use. The increase will occur because just as the faster modes of absorption of a drug increases the addictive potential a drug, broadband Internet access provides the "hit" in a much more rapid manner, enabling a faster psychological impact. Few people, except those who have had a problem, recognize the power and attraction of being online. This is changing rapidly, however. And although it is probably not an epidemic, I have little doubt that millions of people are experiencing a negative impact in their lives because of compulsive use of the Internet, and I believe that number will continue to grow. Recognition of both the dark and light side of the Internet will enable us to be served by technology, instead of ensnared by it!
Dr. David N. Greenfield is a practicing psychologist and business consultant, with specialties in family psychology, business coaching and consulting, employee assistance and addictions treatment. He is founding partner of Psychological Health Associates, LLC and CEO of The Center for Internet Studies (Virtual-Addiction.com), which conducts research, training, consultation and educational services on Internet use and behavior. Dr. Greenfield's research and clinical work on Internet addiction has appeared on nationwide television and press. Recognized as one of the leading authorities on Internet use and abuse, Greenfield is author of Virtual Addiction: Help for Netheads, Cyberfreaks and Those Who Love Them. Dr. Greenfield currently serves as president of the Connecticut Psychological Association, and maintains his home and consulting practice in Connecticut. Dr. Greenfield may be contacted by e-mail at drgreenfield@virtual-addiction.com or 860/233-9772, ext. 14. This article was excerpted in part from the book Virtual Addiction: Help for Netheads, Cyberfreaks and Those Who Love Them (New Harbinger Publications, 1999) by Dr. David N. Greenfield. ©1999 Dr. David N. Greenfield |
||||||